
Hortensia de los Santos
Seeker of Ancient Echoes
Melchizedek, Theophanies, and the Eternal Word - (Cont.)
Data Analysis
So if I as devil’s advocate were to say “These sacred stories must have been influenced by Christian missionaries, or derived from Old World traditions after Columbus…” those dates would totally prove they were not; those dates dismantle that argument.
1. Deep Antiquity of the Sacred Figures
- Viracocha and Tunupa are tied to Tiwanaku and Lake Titicaca cultures dating back to at least 1500 BCE. That’s nearly two millennia before Christ and three thousand years before Europeans arrived.
- Feathered Serpent symbolism appears in Olmec art around 1200 BCE—again, long before Jesus or Rome.
2. Pre-Christian Monumental Architecture
- Temples, pyramids, and depictions of these figures are found at Tiwanaku, Teotihuacan, Chichén Itzá, and La Venta, built long before any contact with Europe.
- These sites encode celestial alignments, flood stories, and duality concepts indigenous to their own cosmology.
3. Linguistic and Cultural Independence
- These sacred names—Viracocha, Quetzalcoatl, Gucumatz, etc.—have no linguistic connection to Hebrew, Greek, or Latin.
- They are embedded in Quechua, Aymara, Nahuatl, Kʼicheʼ, and other deeply rooted Native American languages.
4. Consistency Across Isolated Regions
- Similar figures appear across thousands of miles, from Bolivia to Mexico, with no contact among them, and no influence from Europe until the 1500s CE.
- Their core narratives—civilizer, teacher, flood, return—are internally coherent and predate external influence.
Conclusion:
-
"The idea that missionaries or Christian stories inspired these sacred traditions collapses under the weight of time itself. The archaeological and oral evidence firmly places these stories at the heart of Indigenous belief systems long before Christianity emerged."
Let us consider now who was the first recognized Theophany
Melchizedek
- Appears suddenly in Genesis 14:18–20: “Melchizedek king of Salem brought out bread and wine. He was priest of God Most High.”
- He blesses Abram and receives a tithe from him.
- He is not Jewish, not part of any known priesthood.
- Later, Psalm 110:4 prophesies: “You are a priest forever, in the order of Melchizedek.”
- In the New Testament, especially Hebrews 7: Melchizedek is described as:
- “Without father or mother, without genealogy, without beginning of days or end of life...”
- A priest eternally, greater than Abraham.
- A type of Christ, eternal and cosmic.
Viracocha and Melchizedek: Parallels
Theme Melchizedek Viracocha / Tunupa / Quetzalcoatl Divine origin Priest of “El Elyon” (God Most High) Creator god, or emissary of a higher power No genealogy “Without father, without mother…” No parents or lineage; appears suddenly Bringer of order Blesses Abraham, symbolizes divine law Brings law, ethics, agriculture, astronomy Symbolic acts Bread and wine = spiritual nourishment Brings knowledge to nourish mind and spirit Mysterious appearance Appears, blesses, vanishes Arrives, civilizes, departs over the sea Eternal priesthood Prefigures Christ as eternal mediator Echoes an ageless being returning across time Outside formal religion Not Levite, not Hebrew Not part of native pantheons—set apart, singular Deeper Meaning: The Universal Priest-King Archetype)
Melchizedek could be seen as a manifestation of the Logos before the Incarnation—the spiritual order that underlies creation.
So could Viracocha and his counterparts be regional reflections of the same eternal priesthood? Perhaps: Christ is the fulfillment of the Melchizedek archetype, and Viracocha was a foreshadowing of that eternal presence?
One divine priest-king appearing in many lands, under many names—blessing, teaching, and leaving behind a sacred memory.
The Eternal Priest
In every age, across continents, through whispers in firelit caves and chants beneath temple stones, humanity has remembered a figure who comes not from among them, but from beyond—bearing knowledge, blessing, and order.
In the Hebrew scriptures, such a figure appears briefly yet resoundingly: Melchizedek, king of Salem and priest of El Elyon—God Most High. He blesses Abraham with bread and wine, and vanishes. He is not of Abraham's lineage. He has no known ancestry. The Psalmist later writes: “You are a priest forever, after the order of Melchizedek.” And the Letter to the Hebrews calls him “without father or mother, without genealogy, having neither beginning of days nor end of life.”
He is not just a man. He is a presence. An eternal priesthood beyond temples and bloodlines.
Far across the ocean, millennia before or after, depending on how we reckon time, another such figure appears in the high Andes, emerging from the waters of Lake Titicaca or walking from the vast Pacific. Viracocha—bearded, robed, sorrowful—is said to have shaped the world after a great flood. He taught humanity to live in peace, to plant, to build, to honor the heavens. He was mocked by some, revered by others. And then, like Melchizedek, he departed, walking across the sea, promising to return.
The same story reemerges in Mesoamerica. Quetzalcoatl, the Feathered Serpent, comes from the east, bearing laws, calendars, and ethics. He too is betrayed or rejected, and leaves, sailing eastward on a raft of serpents. The Maya knew him as Kukulkan, the K’iche’ as Gucumatz. Each a variation—each a flash of the same light through the prism of culture.
What are we to make of this?
Is this mere coincidence?Or are these fragmented memories of an ancient presence—perhaps the Logos, the divine Word, known before time, manifesting to guide the world?
Perhaps Melchizedek and Viracocha are not different at all. Perhaps they are different names for the same eternal emissary—one who appears when humanity has been broken by flood or fire, confusion or war. He comes not to dominate, but to bless. Not to conquer, but to restore. He brings sacred knowledge, heals division, and then vanishes—leaving only stories, carvings, and the aching hope of return.
In this sense, Christ is not a rupture in history, but its fulfillment—the moment the eternal priest takes on a name we remember. As Hebrews says, “Jesus has become a high priest forever in the order of Melchizedek.”
And yet—what if He had come before? What if the same divine priest had walked upon other mountains, wept before other altars, and vanished into other seas? Perhaps the stories of Viracocha are not myths at all. Perhaps they are testimonies.
The Theophanies Before Christ
Across time, there were mystics, prophets, and figures who came as light-bearers—beings who shaped entire civilizations and then Comes Jesus…)
Jesus does not deny these previous forms—He fulfills them. He is the Logos, the eternal Word, made flesh. He names Himself "I AM", evokes the Eternal Priest (Melchizedek), and bears the traits of the long-waited divine visitor of many traditions. But then—He dies. He rises. He ascends. And for more than 2000 years… Silence?
Have There Been No More Theophanies?
Here we confront the grief and mystery of our time. Perhaps we should first ask:-
Would we recognize one if it came?
- History tells us again and again:
- The prophets were stoned.
- The saints were silenced.
- The mystics were burned.
- The poets were mocked.
- And when the divine came with a face, we crucified Him.
- You ask: “Has He come and we, as always, killed Him again?”
- It is a chilling and holy question.
Final Reflection: Is the Silence Real?
Maybe it’s not that God stopped coming, but that our world grew too loud. The theophanies still arrive—but in private, not public.In dreams, in synchronicities, in a stranger’s words at the perfect moment, in the deep stillness beneath suffering.
As Jesus said: “Whoever believes in Me will do the works I do—and greater.” (John 14:12) So Has He Come Again?
Perhaps He has come a thousand times—
and we have crucified Him a thousand times.
Or perhaps He now waits in silence—
until we remember how to see, how to hear, how to become the vessels we once were.
May the Eternal Creator bless you all
“May the divine, in whatever form it once walked among us, find us listening again. May our hearts remember what our histories forgot, and may we welcome the sacred not with fear, but with recognition. If the gods return, may they find us with open hands and steady eyes.”